FTC Goes After Network Marketing Industry
On April 12, 2006, the Federal Trade Commission proposed a new rule that will make it unlawful for any person who presents a business opportunity to do so without making specific affirmative disclosures on a federal form to every prospect seven days before the consummation of a deal. The failure to make the required disclosures is itself a deceptive advertising practice under the proposed rule. The practice is deceptive even if the underlying business transaction is legitimate.
Click below to listen to Jonathan Emord's speech at the MLMIA's 22nd Annual Convention & Expo in La Jolla, CA in April, right after the FTC's announcement. His entire talk is about 70 minutes long but a great summary of the effects of the proposed ruling.
Summary Of FTC Ruling
I have my opinions of what this all means....or may mean to you and I. But I'll let my friend Tony Rush's words make my point for me.
"I think the 7-day waiting period is silly.....but I have no problem with most of what they're proposing. In fact, disclosures such as what they're asking for will do a lot to clean the riff-raff out of the industry and make things much more transparent.
If I had to guess, I'd say that the 7-day requirement and the "10 previous customers" requirement will get thrown out at some point. When you consider that the waiting periods for buying a house or buying a gun aren't that strict....it seems silly to tell a lady that she has to wait 7 days before she can sign up in Avon.
And I think the "10 previous customers" thing will probably get tossed because of privacy laws. In this day and age, I think the FTC is going to be hard-pressed to get people to willingly hand out 10 names and phone numbers to a complete stranger just because someone is considering getting involved in a business.
But, other than that, I say the disclosures are a good thing."
Now what do YOU think?
Weigh in and leave your feelings as a comment.
















1 Comments:
These are the comments to the FTC that I posted to the Cognigen Agent pages:
I'd encourage you to do what you can to comment before the deadline. While this will have a minimal impact on what we do, it may add a level of paperwork and time that I personally don't have right now.
The link to the comment page is
https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-bizopNPR/ with comments due NLT than Monday.
Now ... my comments ... disagree or agree tell the FTC what you think.
I work a "day job" and I also am involved in Multi-Level or Network Marketing. As a Citizen and as an entrepreneur, I am commenting about the proposed rules.
While I have experienced hype in marketing (and not just network marketing), I also have encouraged my membership, downline, organization, whatever you wish to call it, to go forward steadily and with purpose.
Sometimes, it's hard to make commission. Sometimes it's hard to get an agent to enroll. Sometimes people spend money they don't have "chasing the dream".
However, this is a land of freedoms. You have the right to sign up at http://mayescem.ld.net or not. You have the freedom to work the program or not. You have the freedom to join some other program or not.
As I tell my son, with freedom comes responsibility. The customer has the responsibility of due diligence. Doing their homework will make the customer a better network marketing consumer. Waiting five days to enroll will not make them smarter.
IF this rule is enacted to the purpose of hurting an industry, will the Federal Trade Commission enact a rule requiring a five-day wait for buying stocks? After all, I've lost more money this year in the stock market than I did in multilevel marketing.
I am a proponent of Government governing and not making arbitrary and capricious rules, ex. why five days rather than one or ten. Therefore, while on the surface, you make an effort to protect the Citizen, you place barriers before them that help them never do anything. THAT is a real business killer.
Please abstain from this line and focus your attention of more serious items than a $50 kit (my company does not charge a dime to catch the vision). We are already exceeding the letter and intent of your proposal. Nevertheless, the proposal, on the surface, is an effort to protect the Citizen who is too lazy to do due diligence but at it's core is just an attempt to place onerous rules on an entire industry.
Thank you for this attention.
With regards,
Lloyd Colston
Colston and Associates
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home